Reconnecting with your contacts: ‘turns’ don’t matter
My wife and I got into an animated discussion (read: argument) yesterday morning about whether she should follow up with an acquaintance she hadn’t heard from in a few months.
My wife’s take: she shouldn’t. She argued that it was the acquaintance who had twice canceled plans at the last minute and had promised to call soon to reschedule. And if that was too difficult to do, well, then, maybe the meetup wasn’t worth pursuing in the first place.
My take: my wife should make the call anyway.
There are probably dozens of people in my personal, professional, and personal/professional networks that I’m overdue on following up and reconnecting with. I’ve been busy. They’ve been busy. I haven’t called or e-mailed. They haven’t called or e-mailed. But here’s the bottom line: I haven’t been in touch with people that are important to me. Does it really matter whose “turn” it is to initiate our next conversation?
All of us usually have the best of intentions when we say we’ll follow up, but the longer the wait, the harder reaching out again sometimes becomes. But as Connected Workers, you and I know that we need to take that initiative.
So here’s a challenge for you this week: take a look at your Outlook address book, your cellphone contacts, or your LinkedIn connections, and identify three people that you haven’t spoken with in at least three to six months. Make a pledge today to reach out to all of them in the next seven days and say you’ve been thinking about them. If you also happen to live in the same physical part of the world — a seemingly decreasing reality in this online social media age — propose catching up over a meal or drink, or at a family event. You could do that in the form of an e-mail, text message, or Jott, or you could really surprise them with a phone call. You — and they — will be glad you did.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.


July 23rd, 2007 at 9:36 am
Hi Bryan, GREAT point about the turns. I myself am trying to get a little better about approaching relationships from a “tit for tat” perspective. Thanks for pointing this out for everyone’s benefit. I think it’s very important.
July 23rd, 2007 at 9:51 am
Thanks for the comment, Alexandra. I know that’s it natural to get a bit resentful when we feel we’re holding up *our* end of the bargain, and the other person isn’t. But for relationships that are important, we have to get over that hurdle.
And getting in touch with someone we haven’t spoken to in ages is one way to do that.
July 23rd, 2007 at 12:22 pm
Hm, I’ve always thought turns do matter a bit! My friend just got blown off for the third time on Friday and we agreed the guy probably just doesn’t like him. I, too, constantly feel as if I’m trying harder to keep in touch with some people than they do. In this case, I wonder if the return is worth all that investment.
July 23rd, 2007 at 1:45 pm
Well, Rebecca, I might have added this qualifier: Taking turns doesn’t matter, provided the relationship is worth reviving/keeping in the first place. In the example you give above, it doesn’t sound like continuing to try and make things with that guy is worth your friend’s time.
Thanks for your comment.
July 26th, 2007 at 8:58 am
I think you’re totally right Bryan, and I think this is an important lifelong practice. I also think there are many many shades of ways to keep old doors and passageways open, many of which do not require “turn-taking.” I have contacts from years ago that I rarely think about and then one day I see something that reminds me of them and forward it. It doesn’t have to be any big deal or any forced reunion and reconnection. Just a friendly “you’re worth remembering” gesture.
July 29th, 2007 at 3:51 am
Bryan - excellent point.
I try to give people the benefit of the doubt with things like this. There have been numerous examples over the years where persistence has paid off.